LynnH.com, home of ColorJoy Knitting and Lynn DT Hershberger ColorJoy, Art as an everyday attitude.
LynnH.com - ColorJoy.com ColorJoy Weblog The LynnH SockTour LynnH Class Schedule LynnH Online Shop Polymer Clay Art by LynnH Lynn DT Hershberger Art Page Music - The Fabulous Heftones

One of These is Not Like the Other

I am excited to be puttering away at a new legwarmer pattern. The idea is to have it work for more heights than the first one I wrote.

I want the pattern to work for ankle warmers, up-to-the-knee standard legwarmers, and thigh-high legwarmers, in one pattern. In order to make this more do-able (especially for those ladies with curvy/goddess leg shapes), I have been working with ribbing.

The first anklewarmer I made, I can wear happily. I had my friend Marie try mine on. Normallyunmatchedanklescolorcorrectedweb for the Road-Tested Legwarmer pattern, I would knit her four more stitches in Aran-weight yarn. That is something like an extra inch of wiggle room beyond my size.

It really worked. She can get *my* legwarmer over her knees in a snug, but comfy way. Score.

So I made a second ankle warmer at the same height/out of the same yarn as the first. Can you see what I didn’t see until I put these on for a photo?

OK, so the heights look uneven, but that is the camera angle and my pose. They are the same height, straight-on.

OK, the stripes don’t match up. That’s the nature of the beast, so I expected that.

It’s Mochi Plus yarn (a worsted-weight version of the Mini Mochi fingering-weight yarn that came out last year). For the record, this yarn is great for non-scratchy legwarmers… it’s really softly spun but has some nylon to give it even more bounce-back-ability than a lot of other soft wools and wool blends.

So if it’s not the stripes or height, what went funky? Well, the first one I knit (on the left/back leg in the photo), I worked a K2P2 ribbing. On the second one, at right here, I worked a K3P1 ribbing. Hmmm.

I like the smoothness of the 3 knits in a row, but it doesn’t stretch quite as well as the first one. It also is not reversable as K2P2 is, so a folded-over top cuff would have a different look (which is either interesting or distracting, depending on the knitter/wearer).

I am very fond of K3P1 ribbing as a general rule. However, particularly because of the extra stretch and the reverseability (is that a word?) of the K2P2, I’m leaning toward using that, as I had originally planned.

Input, anyone??? I am listening.

2 Responses to “One of These is Not Like the Other”

  1. Irene Says:

    Hi Lynn!

    I agree with your attitude about k2p2 ribbing and k3p1 ribbing. How about if you leave it up to the knitter, but explain why/how/and differences between the two. If the knitter/wearer needs the stretch, go 2 X 2, but if not, and a turned-over cuff that is different from the “front” doesn’t matter to the wearer, go with the 3 X 1.

    That was smart of you to knit them both ways – now you have models AND reasons for two different ways of knitting them!

    So will you use short rows for bigger calves, knees, and thighs?

    I look forward to your finished pattern!

    Irene

  2. Rachel Says:

    I do like the look of the 3×1 ribbing better. It ’shows’ the yarn better. However I do use 2×2 more for the stretching factor.

Leave a Reply